ARMA International Maturity Model for Information Governance

A Picture of Effective Information Governance

The Maturity Model for Information Governance begins to paint a more complete picture of what effective information governance looks like. It is based on the eight GARP ® principles as well as a foundation of standards, best practices, and legal/regulatory requirements.

GARP ®
Principle
Level 1
(Sub-Standard)

Level 2
(In Development)

Level 3
(Essential)

Level 4
(Proactive)

Level 5
(Transformational)

Integrity
A recordkeeping program shall be constructed so the records and information generated or managed by or for the organization have a reasonable and suitable guarantee of authenticity and reliability.

There are no systematic audits or defined processes for showing the origin and authenticity of a record.

Various organizational functions use ad hoc methods to demonstrate authenticity and chain of custody, as appropriate, but their trustworthiness cannot easily be guaranteed.

Some organizational records are stored with their respective metadata that demonstrate authenticity; however, no formal process is defined for metadata storage and chain of custody.

Metadata storage and chain of custody methods are acknowledged to be important, but are left to the different departments to handle as they determine is appropriate.

The organization has a formal process to ensure that the required level of authenticity and chain of custody can be applied to its systems and processes.

Appropriate data elements to demonstrate compliance with the policy are captured.

The organization has defined specific goals related to integrity.

There is a clear definition of metadata requirements for all systems, business applications, and paper records that are needed to ensure the authenticity of records.

Metadata requirements include security and signature requirements and chain of custody as needed to demonstrate authenticity.

The metadata definition process is an integral part of the records management practice in the organization.

There is a formal, defined process for introducing new record-generating systems and the capture of their metadata and other authenticity requirements, including chain of custody.

This level is easily and regularly audited.

The organization’s stated goals related to integrity have been met. The organization can consistently and confidently demonstrate the accuracy and authenticity of its records.

For each principle, the maturity model associates various characteristics that are typical for each of the five levels in the model:

  • Level 1 (Sub-standard): This level describes an environment where recordkeeping concerns are either not addressed at all, or are addressed in a very ad hoc manner. Organizations that identify primarily with these descriptions should be concerned that their programs will not meet legal or regulatory scrutiny.
  • Level 2 (In Development): This level describes an environment where there is a developing recognition that recordkeeping has an impact on the organization, and that the organization may benefit from a more defined information governance program. However, in Level 2, the organization is still vulnerable to legal or regulatory scrutiny since practices are ill-defined and still largely ad hoc in nature.
  • Level 3 (Essential): This level describes the essential or minimum requirements that must be addressed in order to meet the organization's legal and regulatory requirements. Level 3 is characterized by defined policies and procedures, and more specific decisions taken to improve recordkeeping. However, organizations that identify primarily with Level 3 descriptions may still be missing significant opportunities for streamlining business and controlling costs.
  • Level 4 (Proactive): This level describes an organization that is initiating information governance program improvements throughout its business operations. Information governance issues and considerations are integrated into business decisions on a routine basis, and the organization easily meets its legal and regulatory requirements. Organizations that identify primarily with these descriptions should begin to consider the business benefits of information availability in transforming their organizations globally.
  • Level 5 (Transformational): This level describes an organization that has integrated information governance into its overall corporate infrastructure and business processes to such an extent that compliance with the program requirements is routine. These organizations have recognized that effective information governance plays a critical role in cost containment, competitive advantage, and client service.

Download Full .PDF Version of the GARP ® Information Governance Maturity Model.

Information Governance Maturity Model © 2010, ARMA International


Special thanks to our GARP® outreach sponsors:

   

 
     
 

© 2012, ARMA International