Integrity
A recordkeeping program shall be constructed so the records and information generated or managed by or for the organization have a reasonable and suitable guarantee of authenticity and reliability.
|
There are no systematic audits or defined processes for showing the origin and authenticity of a record.
Various organizational functions use ad hoc methods to demonstrate authenticity and chain of custody, as appropriate, but their trustworthiness cannot easily be guaranteed. |
Some organizational records are stored with their respective metadata that demonstrate authenticity; however, no formal process is defined for metadata storage and chain of custody.
Metadata storage and chain of custody methods are acknowledged to be important, but are left to the different departments to handle as they determine is appropriate. |
The organization has a formal process to ensure that the required level of authenticity and chain of custody can be applied to its systems and processes.
Appropriate data elements to demonstrate compliance with the policy are captured.
The organization has defined specific goals related to integrity. |
There is a clear definition of metadata requirements for all systems, business applications, and paper records that are needed to ensure the authenticity of records.
Metadata requirements include security and signature requirements and chain of custody as needed to demonstrate authenticity.
The metadata definition process is an integral part of the records management practice in the organization. |
There is a formal, defined process for introducing new record-generating systems and the capture of their metadata and other authenticity requirements, including chain of custody.
This level is easily and regularly audited.
The organization’s stated goals related to integrity have been met. The organization can consistently and confidently demonstrate the accuracy and authenticity of its records. |